Range Rover 2003 vs Range Rover 2013
Pick up to 4 cars and compare them side by side.
🏆 Beseyat pick
Range Rover
100/100
Relative score in this comparison
Range Rover — most powerful, most efficient, biggest boot
most powerful · Range Rover
most efficient · Range Rover
biggest boot · Range Rover
Best value per row is highlighted
| Relative score in this comparison /100 | 0 | 100 |
|---|---|---|
| Price & ownership | ||
| Price range | — | — |
| Used market price | 63,000 – 85,000 SAR (2014) | 63,000 – 85,000 SAR (2014) |
| Engine | ||
| Fuel type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Displacement | 4.4 L | 5.0 L |
| Cylinders | 8 | 8 |
| Power | 286 hp | 510 hp |
| Torque | 440 Nm | 625 Nm |
| Battery capacity | — | — |
| Electric range | — | — |
| Performance | ||
| 0–100 km/h | 9.2 s | 5.4 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 225 km/h |
| Transmission | Automatic · 5 | Automatic · 8 |
| Drivetrain | All-wheel drive (AWD) | All-wheel drive (AWD) |
| Fuel economy | ||
| Fuel economy | 6.2 km/L | 7.8 km/L |
| Tank capacity | 100 L | 105 L |
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4,950 mm | 4,999 mm |
| Width | 1,923 mm | 1,983 mm |
| Height | 1,862 mm | 1,835 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,880 mm | 2,922 mm |
| Boot capacity | 535 L | 909 L |
| Weight | — | 2,330 kg |
| Ground clearance | — | — |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Safety | ||
| Airbags | 6 | — |
| NCAP rating | — | — |
| ADAS systems | 0 | 3
|
| Features | ||
| Key features |
|
|
| Warranty | ||
| Warranty | — | — |
FAQs about this comparison
Which costs less in fuel?
At 20,000 km per year, Range Rover 2013 costs roughly 5,974 SAR a year in fuel/energy versus about 7,516 SAR for Range Rover 2003 (estimate at current Saudi prices).
Popular comparisons
Prices are indicative, include VAT, and may vary — always confirm with the dealer.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.