Volvo XC90 2015 vs BMW iX3 2026
Pick up to 4 cars and compare them side by side.
🏆 Beseyat pick
Volvo XC90
69/100
Relative score in this comparison
Volvo XC90 — safest, biggest boot
most powerful · BMW iX3
most efficient · BMW iX3
safest · Volvo XC90
biggest boot · Volvo XC90
Best value per row is highlighted
| Relative score in this comparison /100 | 69 | 54 |
|---|---|---|
| Price & ownership | ||
| Price range | — | — |
| Used market price | — | — |
| Engine | ||
| Fuel type | Petrol | Electric |
| Displacement | 2.0 L | — |
| Cylinders | 4 | — |
| Power | 300 hp | 469 hp |
| Torque | 420 Nm | 645 Nm |
| Battery capacity | — | 108.7 kWh |
| Electric range | — | 805 km |
| Performance | ||
| 0–100 km/h | 6.7 s | 4.9 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 210 km/h |
| Transmission | Automatic · 8 | Single-speed (EV) · 1 |
| Drivetrain | All-wheel drive (AWD) | All-wheel drive (AWD) |
| Fuel economy | ||
| Fuel economy | 10.5 km/L | — |
| Tank capacity | 71 L | — |
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4,953 mm | 4,782 mm |
| Width | 1,958 mm | 1,895 mm |
| Height | 1,776 mm | 1,635 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,984 mm | 2,897 mm |
| Boot capacity | 640 L | 520 L |
| Weight | 2,000 kg | 2,285 kg |
| Ground clearance | 223 mm | — |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Safety | ||
| Airbags | 8 | 8 |
| NCAP rating | ★★★★★ | — |
| ADAS systems | 4
|
4
|
| Features | ||
| Key features |
|
|
| Warranty | ||
| Warranty | — | 4 years / 200,000 km |
FAQs about this comparison
Which costs less in fuel?
At 20,000 km per year, BMW iX3 2026 costs roughly 810 SAR a year in fuel/energy versus about 4,152 SAR for Volvo XC90 2015 (estimate at current Saudi prices).
Popular comparisons
Prices are indicative, include VAT, and may vary — always confirm with the dealer.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.