Suzuki Swift 2017 vs Suzuki Swift 2011

Pick up to 4 cars and compare them side by side.

Suzuki Swift
🏆 Beseyat pick Suzuki Swift
77/100 Relative score in this comparison

Suzuki Swift — most efficient, safest, biggest boot

Suzuki Swift 77
Suzuki Swift 23
most powerful · Suzuki Swift most efficient · Suzuki Swift safest · Suzuki Swift biggest boot · Suzuki Swift
Best value per row is highlighted
Relative score in this comparison /100 77 23
Price & ownership
Price range
Engine
Fuel type Petrol Petrol
Displacement 1.2 L 1.4 L
Cylinders 4 4
Power 83 hp 94 hp
Torque 108 Nm 130 Nm
Battery capacity
Electric range
Performance
0–100 km/h 12.0 s 12.3 s
Top speed 165 km/h 165 km/h
Transmission CVT Automatic · 4
Drivetrain Front-wheel drive (FWD) Front-wheel drive (FWD)
Fuel economy
Fuel economy 21.0 km/L 20.0 km/L
Tank capacity 37 L 42 L
Dimensions
Length 3,840 mm 3,850 mm
Width 1,735 mm 1,695 mm
Height 1,495 mm 1,510 mm
Wheelbase 2,450 mm 2,430 mm
Boot capacity 265 L 211 L
Weight 900 kg 1,020 kg
Ground clearance
Seats 5 5
Doors 5 5
Safety
Airbags 6 7
NCAP rating ★★★★
ADAS systems 4
  • Anti-lock braking
  • Electronic stability control
  • Rear-view camera
  • Hill-start assist
0
Features
Key features
  • Light, nippy city hatch
  • Apple CarPlay & Android Auto
  • Alloy wheels
  • Keyless start
  • Third generation, KSA 2011-2017
  • Volume KSA engine: 1.4L K14B (94 hp)
  • 4-speed automatic or 5-speed manual
  • Light, agile supermini
  • Popular budget hatchback in KSA
Warranty
Warranty

FAQs about this comparison

Which costs less in fuel?

At 20,000 km per year, Suzuki Swift 2017 costs roughly 2,076 SAR a year in fuel/energy versus about 2,180 SAR for Suzuki Swift 2011 (estimate at current Saudi prices).

AI guidance is informational; confirm details with the dealer.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

Add a comment

Comments are reviewed before they appear.

By posting a comment you agree to our Terms of Use

Prices are indicative, include VAT, and may vary — always confirm with the dealer.