Mazda CX-9 2016 vs Exeed ET 2026
Pick up to 4 cars and compare them side by side.
🏆 Beseyat pick
Exeed ET
69/100
Relative score in this comparison
Exeed ET — most powerful, most efficient, biggest boot
most powerful · Exeed ET
most efficient · Exeed ET
safest · Mazda CX-9
biggest boot · Exeed ET
Best value per row is highlighted
| Relative score in this comparison /100 | 31 | 69 |
|---|---|---|
| Price & ownership | ||
| Price range | — | — |
| Used market price | 57,500 – 88,000 SAR (2019) | — |
| Engine | ||
| Fuel type | Petrol | Plug-in hybrid |
| Displacement | 2.5 L | 1.5 L |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Power | 231 hp | 463 hp |
| Torque | 420 Nm | 634 Nm |
| Battery capacity | — | 41.2 kWh |
| Electric range | — | 200 km |
| Performance | ||
| 0–100 km/h | 7.9 s | 4.8 s |
| Top speed | 200 km/h | 195 km/h |
| Transmission | Automatic · 6 | Single-speed (EV) · 1 |
| Drivetrain | All-wheel drive (AWD) | All-wheel drive (AWD) |
| Fuel economy | ||
| Fuel economy | 11.5 km/L | 19.2 km/L |
| Tank capacity | 74 L | 67 L |
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 5,075 mm | 4,955 mm |
| Width | 1,969 mm | 1,975 mm |
| Height | 1,747 mm | 1,698 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,930 mm | 3,000 mm |
| Boot capacity | 230 L | 546 L |
| Weight | 1,950 kg | 2,380 kg |
| Ground clearance | 220 mm | — |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Safety | ||
| Airbags | 6 | 7 |
| NCAP rating | ★★★★★ | — |
| ADAS systems | 4
|
4
|
| Features | ||
| Key features |
|
|
| Warranty | ||
| Warranty | — | 8 years / 250,000 km |
FAQs about this comparison
Which costs less in fuel?
At 20,000 km per year, Exeed ET 2026 costs roughly 2,427 SAR a year in fuel/energy versus about 3,791 SAR for Mazda CX-9 2016 (estimate at current Saudi prices).
Popular comparisons
Prices are indicative, include VAT, and may vary — always confirm with the dealer.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.