Ford Ranger 2016 vs Ford Ranger 2026
Pick up to 4 cars and compare them side by side.
🏆 Beseyat pick
Ford Ranger
64/100
Relative score in this comparison
Ford Ranger — most efficient, safest
most powerful · Ford Ranger
most efficient · Ford Ranger
safest · Ford Ranger
Best value per row is highlighted
| Relative score in this comparison /100 | 64 | 36 |
|---|---|---|
| Price & ownership | ||
| Price range | — | 137,885 SAR – 205,000 SAR |
| Used market price | 30,000 – 40,000 SAR (2016) | 90,000 – 136,390 SAR (2024) |
| Engine | ||
| Fuel type | Diesel | Petrol |
| Displacement | 2.2 L | 2.3 L |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Power | 160 hp | 270 hp |
| Torque | 385 Nm | 452 Nm |
| Battery capacity | — | — |
| Electric range | — | — |
| Performance | ||
| 0–100 km/h | 11.5 s | 8.9 s |
| Top speed | 175 km/h | 180 km/h |
| Transmission | Automatic · 6 | Automatic · 10 |
| Drivetrain | Four-wheel drive (4WD) | Four-wheel drive (4WD) |
| Fuel economy | ||
| Fuel economy | 12.0 km/L | 10.2 km/L |
| Tank capacity | 80 L | 80 L |
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 5,362 mm | 5,370 mm |
| Width | 1,860 mm | 1,918 mm |
| Height | 1,830 mm | 1,884 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3,220 mm | 3,270 mm |
| Boot capacity | — | — |
| Weight | 2,100 kg | 2,200 kg |
| Ground clearance | 237 mm | 234 mm |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Safety | ||
| Airbags | 6 | 7 |
| NCAP rating | ★★★★★ | — |
| ADAS systems | 4
|
3
|
| Features | ||
| Key features |
|
|
| Warranty | ||
| Warranty | — | 5 years / 100,000 km |
FAQs about this comparison
Which costs less in fuel?
At 20,000 km per year, Ford Ranger 2016 costs roughly 2,983 SAR a year in fuel/energy versus about 4,275 SAR for Ford Ranger 2026 (estimate at current Saudi prices).
Popular comparisons
Prices are indicative, include VAT, and may vary — always confirm with the dealer.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.