Ford Mustang 2015 vs Ford Mustang (Classic) 1964
Pick up to 4 cars and compare them side by side.
🏆 Beseyat pick
Ford Mustang
100/100
Relative score in this comparison
Ford Mustang — most powerful, most efficient, safest
most powerful · Ford Mustang
most efficient · Ford Mustang
safest · Ford Mustang
Best value per row is highlighted
| Relative score in this comparison /100 | 100 | 0 |
|---|---|---|
| Price & ownership | ||
| Price range | — | — |
| Engine | ||
| Fuel type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Displacement | 2.3 L | 4.9 L |
| Cylinders | 4 | 8 |
| Power | 310 hp | 230 hp |
| Torque | 434 Nm | 407 Nm |
| Battery capacity | — | — |
| Electric range | — | — |
| Performance | ||
| 0–100 km/h | — | 7.5 s |
| Top speed | — | 195 km/h |
| Transmission | Automatic · 10 | Manual · 4 |
| Drivetrain | Rear-wheel drive (RWD) | Rear-wheel drive (RWD) |
| Fuel economy | ||
| Fuel economy | 12.5 km/L | 5.5 km/L |
| Tank capacity | 61 L | 60 L |
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4,784 mm | 4,663 mm |
| Width | 1,916 mm | 1,798 mm |
| Height | 1,381 mm | 1,300 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,720 mm | 2,743 mm |
| Boot capacity | — | 290 L |
| Weight | — | 1,400 kg |
| Ground clearance | — | — |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Safety | ||
| Airbags | 8 | 0 |
| NCAP rating | — | — |
| ADAS systems | 0 | 4
|
| Features | ||
| Key features |
|
|
| Warranty | ||
| Warranty | — | — |
FAQs about this comparison
Which costs less in fuel?
At 20,000 km per year, Ford Mustang 2015 costs roughly 3,488 SAR a year in fuel/energy versus about 8,473 SAR for Ford Mustang (Classic) 1964 (estimate at current Saudi prices).
Popular comparisons
Prices are indicative, include VAT, and may vary — always confirm with the dealer.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.