Chevrolet Camaro 2016 vs Chevrolet Camaro (Classic) 1967
Pick up to 4 cars and compare them side by side.
🏆 Beseyat pick
Chevrolet Camaro
85/100
Relative score in this comparison
Chevrolet Camaro — most powerful, most efficient, safest
most powerful · Chevrolet Camaro
most efficient · Chevrolet Camaro
safest · Chevrolet Camaro
biggest boot · Chevrolet Camaro (Classic)
Best value per row is highlighted
| Relative score in this comparison /100 | 85 | 15 |
|---|---|---|
| Price & ownership | ||
| Price range | — | — |
| Used market price | — | — |
| Engine | ||
| Fuel type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Displacement | 3.6 L | 5.7 L |
| Cylinders | 6 | 8 |
| Power | 335 hp | 300 hp |
| Torque | 385 Nm | 515 Nm |
| Battery capacity | — | — |
| Electric range | — | — |
| Performance | ||
| 0–100 km/h | 5.2 s | 6.5 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h | 200 km/h |
| Transmission | Automatic · 8 | Manual · 4 |
| Drivetrain | Rear-wheel drive (RWD) | Rear-wheel drive (RWD) |
| Fuel economy | ||
| Fuel economy | 9.5 km/L | 5.0 km/L |
| Tank capacity | 72 L | 68 L |
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4,784 mm | 4,763 mm |
| Width | 1,897 mm | 1,880 mm |
| Height | 1,348 mm | 1,300 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,811 mm | 2,743 mm |
| Boot capacity | 260 L | 300 L |
| Weight | 1,600 kg | 1,500 kg |
| Ground clearance | — | — |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Safety | ||
| Airbags | 6 | 0 |
| NCAP rating | ★★★★★ | — |
| ADAS systems | 4
|
4
|
| Features | ||
| Key features |
|
|
| Warranty | ||
| Warranty | — | — |
FAQs about this comparison
Which costs less in fuel?
At 20,000 km per year, Chevrolet Camaro 2016 costs roughly 4,905 SAR a year in fuel/energy versus about 9,320 SAR for Chevrolet Camaro (Classic) 1967 (estimate at current Saudi prices).
Popular comparisons
Prices are indicative, include VAT, and may vary — always confirm with the dealer.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.