Mazda Cosmo 1990 vs Mazda Cosmo Sport 1967
Pick up to 4 cars and compare them side by side.
🏆 Beseyat pick
Mazda Cosmo
77/100
Relative score in this comparison
Mazda Cosmo — most powerful, safest, biggest boot
most powerful · Mazda Cosmo
most efficient · Mazda Cosmo Sport
safest · Mazda Cosmo
biggest boot · Mazda Cosmo
Best value per row is highlighted
| Relative score in this comparison /100 | 77 | 23 |
|---|---|---|
| Price & ownership | ||
| Price range | — | — |
| Used market price | — | — |
| Engine | ||
| Fuel type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Displacement | 2.0 L | 1.0 L |
| Cylinders | 3 | 2 |
| Power | 300 hp | 110 hp |
| Torque | 403 Nm | 130 Nm |
| Battery capacity | — | — |
| Electric range | — | — |
| Performance | ||
| 0–100 km/h | 6.0 s | 8.8 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h | 185 km/h |
| Transmission | Automatic · 4 | Manual · 5 |
| Drivetrain | Rear-wheel drive (RWD) | Rear-wheel drive (RWD) |
| Fuel economy | ||
| Fuel economy | 6.5 km/L | 9.0 km/L |
| Tank capacity | 80 L | 55 L |
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4,815 mm | 4,140 mm |
| Width | 1,795 mm | 1,595 mm |
| Height | 1,305 mm | 1,165 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,750 mm | 2,200 mm |
| Boot capacity | 250 L | 100 L |
| Weight | 1,550 kg | 940 kg |
| Ground clearance | — | — |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Safety | ||
| Airbags | 2 | 0 |
| NCAP rating | — | — |
| ADAS systems | 4
|
4
|
| Features | ||
| Key features |
|
|
| Warranty | ||
| Warranty | — | — |
FAQs about this comparison
Which costs less in fuel?
At 20,000 km per year, Mazda Cosmo Sport 1967 costs roughly 5,178 SAR a year in fuel/energy versus about 7,169 SAR for Mazda Cosmo 1990 (estimate at current Saudi prices).
Popular comparisons
Prices are indicative, include VAT, and may vary — always confirm with the dealer.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.