Ford Mustang (Classic) 1964 vs Ford Mustang 2010
Pick up to 4 cars and compare them side by side.
🏆 Beseyat pick
Ford Mustang
100/100
Relative score in this comparison
Ford Mustang — most powerful, most efficient, safest, biggest boot
most powerful · Ford Mustang
most efficient · Ford Mustang
safest · Ford Mustang
biggest boot · Ford Mustang
Best value per row is highlighted
| Relative score in this comparison /100 | 0 | 100 |
|---|---|---|
| Price & ownership | ||
| Price range | — | — |
| Engine | ||
| Fuel type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Displacement | 4.9 L | 3.7 L |
| Cylinders | 8 | 6 |
| Power | 230 hp | 305 hp |
| Torque | 407 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Battery capacity | — | — |
| Electric range | — | — |
| Performance | ||
| 0–100 km/h | 7.5 s | — |
| Top speed | 195 km/h | — |
| Transmission | Manual · 4 | Automatic · 6 |
| Drivetrain | Rear-wheel drive (RWD) | Rear-wheel drive (RWD) |
| Fuel economy | ||
| Fuel economy | 5.5 km/L | 9.3 km/L |
| Tank capacity | 60 L | 61 L |
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4,663 mm | 4,826 mm |
| Width | 1,798 mm | 1,877 mm |
| Height | 1,300 mm | 1,417 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,743 mm | 2,720 mm |
| Boot capacity | 290 L | 379 L |
| Weight | 1,400 kg | 1,566 kg |
| Ground clearance | — | — |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Safety | ||
| Airbags | 0 | 6 |
| NCAP rating | — | — |
| ADAS systems | 4
|
0 |
| Features | ||
| Key features |
|
|
| Warranty | ||
| Warranty | — | — |
FAQs about this comparison
Which costs less in fuel?
At 20,000 km per year, Ford Mustang 2010 costs roughly 4,688 SAR a year in fuel/energy versus about 8,473 SAR for Ford Mustang (Classic) 1964 (estimate at current Saudi prices).
Popular comparisons
Prices are indicative, include VAT, and may vary — always confirm with the dealer.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.